Ant Man, Noah, and the Value of Life

I’ve heard it said (many times) that there are many English Literature professors who are bemoaning the lack of biblical literacy in our society, because it’s difficult to understand English Literature if we do not understand the Bible.  As the argument goes, the dominant themes and issues that our culture reflects on come from scripture, which has shaped our culture and the literature we produce.  Today’s English majors don’t get the biblical allusions and theological themes that pervade our culture’s great works of literature – but it goes beyond that: scripture is everywhere.

I’m excited to be taking a course next semester called Religious Themes in Literature, but in the meantime I’ve been thoroughly enjoying finding religious themes in comic books, video games, television, and film.  This morning at church our school’s theatre troupe, Prov Players, performed a play that dealt with the topic of suicide and the value of life.  It made me think about Ant Man, and Ultron 5, and Noah.

Allow me a brief synopsis of a story line that unfolded over years of comic books.  Dr. Henry Pym is a brilliant scientist who develops technology that allows him to shrink to the size of an ant (presumably smaller, if he so chose) or to tremendously large sizes (he later sometimes goes by Giant Man).  His original self-experiment shrunk him to ant-size, which was quite dangerous for him; he thus developed technology to allow him to communicate with ants – hence the name, Ant Man.

Ant Man and his girlfriend, Wasp, are two of the original Avengers:

Anyways, enough back story.  Of all of the Avengers, Ant Man is the most reluctant crime-fighter.  He’s a pacifist, and fights for the sake of defending the world.  He hates it.  He would much rather help the world through creating new advances in science and technology, rather than locking up super villains one at a time.  One of the things that he did to help the world is to create a tiny prison for super villains, all shrunk using his technology.  The guards of this prison were robots called Ultron, created in a joint effort between Dr. Pym and Tony Stark (AKA Iron Man).

Ultron was Dr. Pym’s masterpiece, with artificial intelligence based on a map of the human brain – Dr. Pym’s brain, to be exact.  Ultron inherited some of Pym’s ideas, as well: a drive to create a peaceful world, for example.  But during an incredible threat to the planet, Ultron became acquainted with violence.  From that point on Ultron was no longer a pacifist, but still shared Pym’s desire to create a peaceful world.  From that point on, Ultron became convinced that it was only violent life that stood in the way of peaceful existence.  Considering that even his own creator and supposed pacifist, Ant Man, was frequently very violent, Ultron became convinced that the only way to have a peaceful world was to have a world without life – so he set about to destroy all life on earth.  If you’re a sci-fi fan, you’ve heard this story before (for example, the defense computer system, SKYNET, tried the same thing in the Terminator franchise; it also shows up in I, Robot).

Being a synthetic being who was never technically alive, Ultron didn’t realize that there was inherent value in life itself.  He failed to grasp the fact that a peaceful world is pointless without living creatures to enjoy it.  After an epic battle that seemed to be impossible to win, Ant Man gave Ultron an update in his logic: for a truly peaceful world, Ultron could not exist either (at least, according to the 2010 Avengers cartoon series, which condenses decades of comic storylines into a single season).

We of the Abrahamic faiths share a similar story.  God desired to create a perfect world, and created humans in his image in order to help him achieve this goal.  In this story, like the story of Ultron, it is the created ones who turn on their creators; however, in this story the creator is perfect, while the created ones are flawed (while in the Avengers, Ultron is trying to accomplish what Ant Man was too flawed to accomplish).  Human beings rebelled against God, gradually becoming more and more evil, to the point where God’s intended perfect, peaceful world seems impossible to achieve so long as there are people left alive on it.  So God, like Ultron, thinks that perhaps it would be better if human beings did not exist, and plans a flood to wipe out life on earth.  Many environmentalists today muse about this as well; it seems that we’re the only species that doesn’t fit into the ecosystem.  The Matrix dealt with this thought too, as Agent Smith (a computer program) calls human beings a “virus” because we go from place to place, staying only long enough to deplete the resources and destroy the environment before we move on, all for the purpose of our own self-replication.

Unlike Ultron, God is very reluctant to destroy all life on earth.  He sees the inherent value of life, and acts to preserve it.  He gets the last righteous man on earth to build a giant boat, in which he can keep two of every type of animal safe from the flood he’s about to use to destroy the planet.  With these animals, and with Noah and his family, earth will get a second chance.  Ultron offers no second chances: he knows that human beings will always have it in them to be violent.  God knows that too: even after the flood, Genesis tells us that God knew that the desires of humans’ hearts were evil – and yet he gave life another chance anyway.  God goes further, and says that he will never again destroy humanity, even though he knows we’ll be evil again.  Because life is inherently valuable, even when it is evil, destroying life is not a solution to the problem of evil.  Instead, God sets about destroying the evil that is inside the person.  As you may have noticed, this is a long process!

Different versions of this story show up over and over again throughout human history.  In this story, the only difference between a good result (a second chance for the world) and an evil result (elimination of all life) is a sense of inherent value to life itself, no matter how large or small, good or evil, it may be.  The ethical implications of this are numerous: killing, while it may seem to solve many problems, is not in itself a satisfying solution.  This notion affects our understanding of suicide, assassination, abortion, capital punishment, euthanasia, etc.  But going beyond concrete ethical problems, this contributes to our answer to the philosophical problem of evil: if God is good, and all powerful, why is the world evil?  A big part of the answer is simply that life’s inherent value, when combined with sinful humanity, leaves God in a bit of a Catch-22.  Life is an end in itself, and without it peace is meaningless – thus, human beings will go on killing one another until something within us changes, because even violent existence is better than none.

I know I’ve been writing about comics a lot lately, first as the new Apocalyptic a few months ago, and more recently to muse on notions of heaven (my previous post).  What I hope you take away from this is that scripture is everywhere, and Jesus is everywhere.  If you’re looking for Him, you can’t miss Him – and yet so often we fail to see Him at all.  Pick up a comic book, or pop in a movie, and spend some time with Jesus 🙂

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Ant Man, Noah, and the Value of Life

  1. Conversely, when mankind is compared to Ultron, I think the sinful nature is shown with brilliant colour.

    Consider this: a created computer sets out to achieve peace on earth, and does so by removing the naturally violent component: mankind. As you say, Ultron, unalive, does not realize that there is inherent value to human life.

    A created mankind often makes this same mistake: how many times have we seen the Jobs/Africa poster; “One man dies and millions grieve. Millions die and nobody grieves.” When we evaluate bills passed in House of Commons, debated by MPs, we can ask with conviction, “Who here is really concered with the value of these humans’ lives?” We often forego giving human life the value it inherently deserves.

    Ultron, created by Ant Man, finds himself at odds with his creator, eventually making the choice that eliminating the naturally violent mankind is the only way. This means too that Ultron must defy his creator.

    Likewise, our God creator made us in His image: we have imprinted upon us how he *is*. Do we look like Him? Do we act like Him? Do we feel like Him? We have been imprinted with his ethos, and our attraction to love and righteousness, and given the opportunity to fail (free will). And fail we have. In fact, we still desire love and righteousness, but mankind often identifies religion and God (or those who blindly follow the “spaghetti sky monster”) as the source of the lack of love, lack of righteousness. How many times have we read atheists blaming religion for any number of things? How often do Christians decide to act on their own strength, to be good for the sake of goodness, and not because we are saved, and not because we have Christ in us.

    The answer is given to us in Romans 12; like Ultron, we need to be reprogrammed, we need a transformation of the mind, and how we process our history, our situation, our love. How we choose to act, and it is the humble act of self-sacrfice, offering our whole bodies, and ceasing to exist that we can allow Christ to live in us, and offer up that holy worship.

    • Amen, brother! That was the only verse that we had to memorize in first year that I remembered (the only one I’ve ever remembered): “Do not conform to the patterns of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.” I would say, though, that the true sign that Christ is at work in someone is that they would try to be good for the sake of goodness; rather than striving to be good in response to Christ, as we so often and rightly do, those who are good for goodness’ sake do it naturally because they have become more like Christ, to whom goodness is natural. I think this is what is meant by “Christ in me.” It is, truly, in response to what Christ has done – but it is a response unconsciously; it is more result than response.

      On a related note, I saw on Twitter today that someone was asking a question of the potential leaders of the NDP during their debate: what’s the dividing line between a small (good) business and a large (evil) one? The actual size is moot: I say the difference is their ability to remain closely connected to their stakeholders. Our apathy toward other human beings is not based on a lack of appreciation for the value of human life; it is based on our distance (both physical and social) from them, and the corresponding failure to see them as human lives rather than as numbers. This is why activists always try to get CEOs to visit the factories where their products are made, or to visit the villages that are polluted by their factories – because if they meet the people, they will recognize their inherent value in a way that we cannot do abstractly. This also says much about the overwhelming importance of community.

      There’s so much to be said here! Thanks for expanding the view! I love it!

  2. Pingback: On Myth, Story, and Christianity « Stumbling Through Theology

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s